This is the last in a series of 7 posts on sharing combinatorics:
Part 1: Combinatorial Principles for DNA Sharing
Part 2: Non-transitivity
Part 3: A Genetic Pigeonhole Principle
Part 4: Transitivity Principles
Part 5: X-Chromosome Transitivity Principles
Part 6: Mutual Sharing Principle
Part 7: Exceptions
If 23andMe reports something that seems to violate one of our genetic combinatorial principles, the anomaly is presumably due to one of the following:
(1) [the only true exception] unusual situations where two matches on different strands butt up against one another by coincidence, making what are really two separate matches look like one long match;
(2) genotyping errors;
(3) uncertain boundaries on short, close-to-the-threshold matches;
(4) microdeletions (or other, rarer phenomena such as chimeras);
(5) 23andMe's practice of reporting regions as half-identical even though they have a small number of isolated non-matching SNPs;
or (6) on the X chromosome, 23andMe's varying minimum threshold size for reporting matches, which depends on the genders of the individuals whose genomes are being compared.
No comments:
Post a Comment